Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 413-417, October 2010

In vivo Precision of the GE Lunar iDXA Densitometer for the Measurement of Total-Body, Lumbar Spine, and Femoral Bone Mineral Density in Adults

  • Karen Hind

      Affiliations

    • DXA Unit, Carnegie Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan University, Headingley Campus, Leeds, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Karen Hind, PhD, DXA Unit, Carnegie Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan University, Headingley Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QS. UK.
  • ,
  • Brian Oldroyd

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Bone and Body Composition Research, Division of Medical Physics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • ,
  • John G. Truscott

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Bone and Body Composition Research, Division of Medical Physics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Received 24 February 2010; received in revised form 1 June 2010; accepted 1 June 2010. published online 13 August 2010.

Abstract 

Knowledge of precision is integral to the monitoring of bone mineral density (BMD) changes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We evaluated the precision for bone measurements acquired using a GE Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) in self-selected men and women, with mean age of 34.8yr (standard deviation [SD]: 8.4; range: 20.1–50.5), heterogeneous in terms of body mass index (mean: 25.8kg/m2; SD: 5.1; range: 16.7–42.7kg/m2). Two consecutive iDXA scans (with repositioning) of the total body, lumbar spine, and femur were conducted within 1h, for each subject. The coefficient of variation (CV), the root-mean-square (RMS) averages of SDs of repeated measurements, and the corresponding 95% least significant change were calculated. Linear regression analyses were also undertaken. We found a high level of precision for BMD measurements, particularly for scans of the total body, lumbar spine, and total hip (RMS: 0.007, 0.004, and 0.007g/cm2; CV: 0.63%, 0.41%, and 0.53%, respectively). Precision error for the femoral neck was higher but still represented good reproducibility (RMS: 0.014g/cm2; CV: 1.36%). There were associations between body size and total-body BMD and total-hip BMD SD precisions (r=0.534–0.806, p<0.05) in male subjects. Regression parameters showed good association between consecutive measurements for all body sites (r2=0.98–0.99). The Lunar iDXA provided excellent precision for BMD measurements of the total body, lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip.

Key Words: BMD, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, iDXA, precision

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was conducted without external funding/support.

PII: S1094-6950(10)00198-8

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2010.06.002

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 413-417, October 2010