Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 379-384, October 2010

BMD Reference Standards Among South Asians in the United States

  • Alexander Melamed

      Affiliations

    • Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Alexander Melamed, MPH, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Avenue, KAM 100-B, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
  • ,
  • Eric Vittinghoff

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Usha Sriram

      Affiliations

    • Associates in Clinical Endocrinology Education and Research, Chennai, India
  • ,
  • Ann V. Schwartz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Alka M. Kanaya

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

Received 3 March 2010; received in revised form 24 May 2010; accepted 25 May 2010. published online 22 July 2010.

Abstract 

The relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk is not well established for non-white populations. There is no established BMD reference standard for South Asians. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to measure BMD at total hip and lumbar spine in 150 US-based South-Asian Indians. For each subject, T-scores were calculated using BMD reference values based on US white, North Indian, and South Indian populations, and the resulting WHO BMD category assignments were compared. Reference standards derived from Indian populations classified a larger proportion of US-based Indians as normal than did US white-based standards. The percentage of individuals reclassified when changing between reference standards varied by skeletal site and reference population origin, ranging from 13% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7–18%), when switching from US white- to North Indian-based standard for total hip, to 40% (95% CI: 32–48%), when switching from US white to South Indian reference values for lumbar spine. These findings illustrate that choice of reference standard has a significant effect on the diagnosis of osteoporosis in South Asians, and underscore the importance of future research to quantify the relationship between BMD and fracture risk in this population.

Key Words: Bone mineral density, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, osteoporosis, reference standard, South Asians

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest statement: The authors have no financial interests that could influence the design, analysis, or conclusions of this study.

PII: S1094-6950(10)00195-2

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2010.05.007

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 379-384, October 2010