Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 2 , Pages 147-150, April 2010

Can Forearm Bone Mineral Density be Measured With DXA in the Supine Position? A Study in Chinese Population

  • Jinhua Zhao

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Jinhua Zhao, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 85, Wu-Jin Road, Shanghai, People' Republic of China.
  • ,
  • Yan Xing

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
  • ,
  • Qi Zhou

      Affiliations

    • GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China
  • ,
  • Wenya Jin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
  • ,
  • Wynn Wacker

      Affiliations

    • GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA
  • ,
  • Howard S. Barden

      Affiliations

    • GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA

Received 17 August 2009; received in revised form 29 January 2010; accepted 3 February 2010.

Abstract 

The purpose of our study was to confirm that forearm bone mineral density (BMD) results obtained with the patient in the supine position are equivalent to results obtained with patient in the sitting position. The subjects were a Chinese sample of 82 healthy adults (35 males and 47 females; age: 22.5–59.8yr; body mass index: 17.6–32.4). Forearm BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, with the forearm positioned in the sitting and supine positions. Repeated measurements were available for some subjects, and the average of the repeats for those subjects were used in the analysis. The standard enCORE software (GE Lunar, Madison, WI) adjustment for supine position was applied to the BMD values obtained in the supine position for 33% radius, ultradistal (UD) radius, and radius total regions of interest (ROIs) to give sitting-equivalent values. The supine sitting-equivalent results were regressed on the sitting values through the origin. There were statistically significant differences in the UD and total-radius forearm results between supine sitting-equivalent BMD and sitting BMD. The correlation coefficients of UD and total radius were 0.967 and 0.976, respectively. There was no significant difference between supine sitting-equivalent BMD and sitting BMD in the 33% radius forearm BMD. The correlation coefficient of 33% radius was 0.956. For Chinese subjects, there was no significant difference in BMD for the 33% radius, the only ROI recommended for diagnosis by ISCD. Forearm scans could be accomplished with the patient suitably positioned for the routine lumbar spine and proximal femur scans.

Key Words: BMD, DXA, forearm, sitting position, supine position

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(10)00146-0

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2010.02.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 2 , Pages 147-150, April 2010