Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 2 , Pages 228-236 , April 2010

Dynamic Bone Quality: A Noninvasive Measure of Bone's Biomechanical Property in Osteoporosis

  • Amit Bhattacharya

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Nelson B. Watts

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Bone Health and Osteoporosis Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Nelson B. Watts, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Bone Health and Osteoporosis Center, 222 Piedmont Avenue, Suite 6300, Cincinnati, OH 45219.
  • ,
  • Kermit Davis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Susan Kotowski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Rakesh Shukla

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Alok Kumar Dwivedi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Robert Coleman

      Affiliations

    • SignaLysis Co., Cincinnati, OH, USA

Received 28 August 2009 ,Revised 31 December 2009 ,Accepted 1 January 2010.

References 

  1. Fleisch H. Bisphosphonates in bone disease: from the laboratory to the patient. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2000;
  2. Liu XS, Sajda P, Saha PK, et al. Quantification of the roles of trabecular microarchitecture and trabecular type in determining the elastic modulus of human trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:1608–1617
  3. Turner CH. Biomechanics of bone: determinants of skeletal fragility and bone quality. Osteoporosis Int. 2002;13:97–104
  4. Cremers S, Garnero P. Biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical development of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease: potential uses and pitfalls. Drugs. 2006;66:2031–2058
  5. Donescu OS, Battie MC, Videman T, et al. The predictive role of bone turnover markers for BMD in middle-aged men. Aging Male. 2006;9:97–102
  6. Looker AC, Bauer DC, Chesnut CH, et al. Clinical use of biochemical markers of bone remodeling: current status and future directions. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:467–480
  7. Consensus Development Conference . Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1993;94:646–650
  8. Heaney R, Avioli L, Chestnut C, et al. Is bone loss the cause of osteoporotic fracture or its consequence?. J Bone Miner Res. 1988;3:88
  9. Kimmel D, Recker R, Gallagher J, et al. A comparison of iliac bone histomorphometric data in postmenopausal osteoporotic and normal subjects. Bone Miner. 1990;11:217–235
  10. Watts NB, Geusens P, Barton IP, Felsenberg D. Relationship between changes in BMD and nonvertebral fracture incidence associated with risedronate: reduction in risk of nonvertebral fracture is not related to change in BMD. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:2097–2104
  11. Watts NB. Bone quality: getting closer to a definition. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1148–1150
  12. McElhaney JH. Dynamic response of bone and muscle tissue. J Appl Physiol. 1966;21:1231–1236
  13. Yamashita J, Li X, Furman BR, et al. Collagen and bone viscoelasticity: a dynamic mechanical analysis. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:31–36
  14. Paul JL, Munro MB, Abernethy P. Musculoskeletal shock absorption: relative contribution of bone and soft tissues at various frequencies. J Biomech. 1978;11:237–239
  15. Radin EL, Burr DB, Caterson B, et al. Mechanical determinants of osteoarthrosis. Sem Arthritis Rheum. 1991;21:12–21
  16. Radin EL, Paul IL. Does cartilage compliance reduce skeletal impact loads? The relative force-attenuating properties of articular cartilage, synovial fluid, periarticular soft tissues and bone. Arthritis Rheum. 1970;13:139–144
  17. Hoshino A, Wallace WA. Impact-absorbing properties of the human knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1987;69:807–811
  18. Bhattacharya A, McCutcheon EP, Greenleaf JE, Shvartz E. Body acceleration distribution and uptake in man during running and jumping. J Appl Physiol. 1980;49(5):881–887
  19. Voloshin A, Wosk J. Impulse attenuation in the human body. Biomed Sci Instrum. 1980;16:55–59
  20. Voloshin A, Wosk J, Brull M. Force wave transmission through the human locomotor system. J Biomech Eng. 1981;103:48–50
  21. Zioupos P. Accumulation of in-vivo fatigue microdamage and its relation to biomechanical properties in ageing human cortical bone. J Microsc. 2001;201:270–278
  22. Day JS, Van Der Linden JC, Bank RA, et al. Adaptation of subchondral bone in osteoarthritis. Biorheology. 2004;41:359–368
  23. Wei HW, Sun SS, Jao SH, et al. The influence of mechanical properties of subchondral plate, femoral head and neck on dynamic stress distribution of the articular cartilage. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27:295–304
  24. Van Audekercke R, Van Der Perre G. The effect of osteoporosis on the mechanical properties of bone structures. Clin Rheum. 1994;13:38–44
  25. Huang S, Bhattacharya A. The effects of osteoarthritis on the biomechanical properties of the tibia. Chin J Med Biol Eng. 1993;13(3):255–264
  26. Bhattacharya A, Watts NB, Davis K, et al. Dynamic bone quality—a non-invasive measure of bone's biomechanical property. Presented at the 14th Annual Conference of International Society for Clinical Densitometry San Francisco, CA, March 12–15. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:449
  27. Alexander J, Bhattacharya A, Patel P, Brooks S. 1986 Biomechanical aspects of preclinical descriptors of osteoarthritis. Presented at Combined 10th Annual Conference of American Society of Biomechanics and the 4th Biannual Conference of the Canadian Society of Biomechanics, Montreal, Canada, August 25–27, 1986.
  28. Genant HK, Delmas PD, Chen P, et al. Severity of vertebral fracture reflects deterioration of bone microarchitecture. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:69–76
  29. Riancho JA, Valero C, Hernandez JL, et al. Biomechanical indices of the femoral neck estimated from the standard DXA output: age- and sex-related differences. J Clin Densitom. 2007;10:39–45
  30. Saha S, Lakes RS. The effect of soft tissue on wave-propagation and vibration tests for determining the in vivo properties of bone. J Biomech. 1977;10:393–401
  31. Ziegert JC, Lewis JL. The effect of soft tissue on measurements of vibrational bone motion by skin-mounted accelerometers. J Biomech Eng. 1979;101:218–220
  32. Stenstrom M, Olander B, Lehto-Axtelius D, et al. Bone mineral density and bone structure parameters as predictors of bone strength: an analysis using computerized microtomography and gastrectomy-induced osteopenia in the rat. J Biomech. 2000;33:289–297
  33. Aerospace Medical Research Lab. 1971 Symposium on biodynamic models and their applications. Aerospace Medical Division, AMRL-TR-71–29, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 1-980.
  34. Bendat JS, Piersol AG. Random data analysis and measurement procedures. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1986;p. 30
  35. Coleman R. Experimental structural dynamics: an introduction to experimental methods of characterizing vibrating structures. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHOUSE; 2004;pp. 140–226
  36. Meirovitch L. Elements of vibration analysis. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1975;pp. 1–86
  37. Bhattacharya A, Watts N, Gordon J, et al. Bone quantity and quality of youths working in farm—a pilot study. J Agromed Pract Pol Res. 2007;12:27–38
  38. Duan Y, Beck TJ, Wang XF, Seeman E. Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1766–1774
  39. Nguyen ND, Pongchaiyakul C, Center JR, et al. Identification of high-risk individuals for hip fracture: a 14-year prospective study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1921–1928
  40. Pongchaiyakul C, Panichkul S, Songpatanasilp T, Nguyen TV. A nomogram for predicting osteoporosis risk based on age, weight and quantitative ultrasound measurement. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:525–531
  41. Trento LK, Pietropolli A, Ticconi C, et al. Role of type I collagen C telopeptide, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin in the assessment of bone status in postmenopausal women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35:152–159
  42. Shuster S. Osteoporosis, a unitary hypothesis of collagen loss in skin and bone. Med Hypotheses. 2005;65:426–432
  43. Leeming DJ, Henriksen K, Byrjalsen I, et al. Is bone quality associated with collagen age?. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(9):1461–1470
  44. Allen MR, Iwata K, Sato M, Burr DB. Raloxifene enhances vertebral mechanical properties independent of bone density. Bone. 2006;39:1130–1135
  45. Bembey AK, Oyen ML, Bushby AJ, Boyde A. Viscoelastic properties of bone as a function of hydration state determined by nanoindentation. Phil Mag. 2006;86:5691–5703
  46. Christopoulou GE, Stavropoulou A, Anastassopoulos G, et al. Evaluation of modal damping factor as a diagnostic tool for osteoporosis and its relation with serum osteocalcin and collagen I N-telopeptide for monitoring the efficacy of alendronate in ovariectomized rats. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006;41:891–897
  47. Panteliou SD, Xirafaki AL, Panagiotopoulos E, et al. Modal damping for monitoring bone integrity and osteoporosis. J Biomech Eng. 2004;126:1–5
  48. Beck TJ. Measuring the structural strength of bones with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: principles, technical limitations, and future possibilities. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:S81–S88

PII: S1094-6950(10)00002-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.01.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 2 , Pages 228-236 , April 2010