Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 24-28, January 2010

Discordance in Femoral Neck Bone Density in Subjects With Unilateral Hip Osteoarthritis

  • Julie Glowacki

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Meenu Tuteja

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Shelley Hurwitz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Thomas S. Thornhill

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Meryl S. LeBoff

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Meryl S. LeBoff, MD, Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.

Received 12 November 2008; received in revised form 14 August 2009; accepted 8 September 2009.

Abstract 

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disease that increases in incidence with age and currently affects an estimated 27 million Americans. To determine whether site-specific hip bone mineral density (BMD) measures are confounded by the presence of OA, we measured bilateral hip BMD by dual X-ray absorptiometry in 34 subjects (19 women and 15 men) scheduled for hip replacement for confirmed advanced unilateral hip OA. The femoral neck (FN) BMD (p=0.035) and T-score (p=0.017) for the hip with OA was higher than those of the contralateral hip. There was a difference in osteoporosis classification depending on which hip was considered: for 11 of the 34 subjects (32%), the FN T-score was normal for OA hip, but the contralateral hip was classified as osteopenic (T-score between −1.0 and −2.5). For 1 subject, the FN T-score was normal for OA hip, but the contralateral hip was classified as osteoporotic (T-score below −2.5). Discordance was also present for trochanter values and not for total hip values. These data indicate that advanced hip OA can be associated with a higher bone density at the FN and trochanter but not at total hip and that the discrepancy between hips at the FN may have an impact on patient treatment decisions.

Key Words: Bilateral BMD, hip, osteoarthritis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(09)00268-6

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.09.007

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 24-28, January 2010