The Evaluation of Consistency Between Body Composition Assessments in Pediatric Population Using Pencil Beam and Fan Beam Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers
Abstract
The replacement of the old dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry system with a novel one should be preceded by a cross-calibration procedure. Therefore, the study was aimed at investigating the consistency of bone and body composition measures performed in pediatric population using pencil beam (DPX-L; GE Healthcare, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI) and fan beam (Prodigy; GE Healthcare, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI) densitometers. The study group consisted of 212 healthy children aged 4–18
yr. Total body (TB) and lumbar spine (S) (L2–L4) measurements were performed using DPX-L and Prodigy during the same visit. Bland-Altman analysis, linear regressions, and paired t-test were performed to evaluate the consistency of measurements and to establish a cross-calibration equation. The average Prodigy values for TB and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) were 2.7%, 2.4% and 1.6%, 1.6% higher than those of DPX-L, respectively (p
<
0.0001). Prodigy-assessed bone area (BA) was lower by 1.4% for TBBA (p
<
0.0001) and 1.1% for SBA (p
<
0.001). Lean body mass (LBM) from Prodigy was higher by 6.9% (p
<
0.0001), whereas fat mass (FM) was lower by 8.4% compared with those from DPX-L (p
<
0.0001). Bland-Altman analyses revealed the effect of magnitude that was nonlinear (2nd degree polynomial) for TBBMD (r
=
0.32, p
=
0.001), TBBMC (r
=
0.51, p
<
0.0001), TBBA (r
=
0.34, p
<
0.0001), and LBM (r
=
0.56, p
<
0.0001), but not for FM (r
=
0.14, not significant [n.s.]). In contrast, in lumbar spine, the magnitude dependence was linear and significant for SBMC (r
=
0.46, p
<
0.0001) and SBA (r
=
0.34, p
<
0.0001) but not for SBMD (r
=
0.12, n.s.). Both skeletal and body composition variables assessed by DPX-L and Prodigy devices were highly correlated, showing R2 values ranging from 0.976 for FM to 0.994 for SBMC. The results of this study document a necessity for implementation of calculated cross-calibration equations to transform DPX-L–based local pediatric references into a novel Prodigy system.
Key Words: Bone, body composition, cross-calibration, DXA, pediatric
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Institutional grant: 184/07.
PII: S1094-6950(09)00267-4
doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.11.001
© 2010 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
