Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 84-95, January 2010

The Evaluation of Consistency Between Body Composition Assessments in Pediatric Population Using Pencil Beam and Fan Beam Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers

The Department of Biochemistry and Experimental Medicine, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland

Received 13 June 2009; received in revised form 16 November 2009; accepted 17 November 2009.

Abstract 

The replacement of the old dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry system with a novel one should be preceded by a cross-calibration procedure. Therefore, the study was aimed at investigating the consistency of bone and body composition measures performed in pediatric population using pencil beam (DPX-L; GE Healthcare, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI) and fan beam (Prodigy; GE Healthcare, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI) densitometers. The study group consisted of 212 healthy children aged 4–18yr. Total body (TB) and lumbar spine (S) (L2–L4) measurements were performed using DPX-L and Prodigy during the same visit. Bland-Altman analysis, linear regressions, and paired t-test were performed to evaluate the consistency of measurements and to establish a cross-calibration equation. The average Prodigy values for TB and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) were 2.7%, 2.4% and 1.6%, 1.6% higher than those of DPX-L, respectively (p<0.0001). Prodigy-assessed bone area (BA) was lower by 1.4% for TBBA (p<0.0001) and 1.1% for SBA (p<0.001). Lean body mass (LBM) from Prodigy was higher by 6.9% (p<0.0001), whereas fat mass (FM) was lower by 8.4% compared with those from DPX-L (p<0.0001). Bland-Altman analyses revealed the effect of magnitude that was nonlinear (2nd degree polynomial) for TBBMD (r=0.32, p=0.001), TBBMC (r=0.51, p<0.0001), TBBA (r=0.34, p<0.0001), and LBM (r=0.56, p<0.0001), but not for FM (r=0.14, not significant [n.s.]). In contrast, in lumbar spine, the magnitude dependence was linear and significant for SBMC (r=0.46, p<0.0001) and SBA (r=0.34, p<0.0001) but not for SBMD (r=0.12, n.s.). Both skeletal and body composition variables assessed by DPX-L and Prodigy devices were highly correlated, showing R2 values ranging from 0.976 for FM to 0.994 for SBMC. The results of this study document a necessity for implementation of calculated cross-calibration equations to transform DPX-L–based local pediatric references into a novel Prodigy system.

Key Words: Bone, body composition, cross-calibration, DXA, pediatric

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Institutional grant: 184/07.

PII: S1094-6950(09)00267-4

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.11.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 84-95, January 2010