« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1
, Pages 18-23
, January 2010
Is a Fixed Value for the Least Significant Change Appropriate?
References
- Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom. 2005;8:371–378
- . The effect of fat on bone mineral measurements in normal subjects with recommended values of bone, muscle and fat attenuation coefficients. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1987;8:143–158
- Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int. 1995;5:262–270
- Wilson KE, Smith AP. Monitoring BMD with DXA: short- and long-term precision. Available at: http://www.hologic.com/data/W-157_01-06_MonitoringBMD.pdf. Accessed: January 15, 2009.
- Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet. 1993;341:72–75
- Influence of muscle strength and body weight and composition on regional bone mineral density in healthy women aged 60 years and over. Gerontology. 2001;47:207–212
- Leptin, body composition and bone mineral density in premenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;73:27–32
- . Factors affecting short-term bone density precision assessment and the effect on patient monitoring. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:199–204
- . Long-term precision of DXA scanning assessed over seven years in forty postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:68–75
- . Reproducibility of DXA: potential impact on serial measurements and misclassification of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:49–54
- Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:285–289
- . Heteroscedastic regression analysis of factors affecting BMD monitoring. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1842–1849
PII: S1094-6950(09)00242-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.10.001
© 2010 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1
, Pages 18-23
, January 2010
