Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 56-62, January 2010

Risedronate on 2 Consecutive Days a Month Reduced Vertebral Fracture Risk at 1Year Compared With Historical Placebo

  • Nelson B. Watts

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Nelson B. Watts, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Piedmont Avenue, Suite 6300, Cincinnati, OH 45219.
  • ,
  • Jacques P. Brown

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
  • ,
  • Gary Cline

      Affiliations

    • ICON plc, Biostatistics, North Wales, PA, USA

Received 31 March 2009; received in revised form 16 September 2009; accepted 16 September 2009. published online 30 November 2009.

Abstract 

The use of historical controls may be a viable alternative for comparing antifracture efficacy in osteoporosis fracture endpoint trials that do not have a placebo control group. The risedronate 2 consecutive days a month (2CDM) study showed that risedronate 75mg on 2 consecutive days had similar increases in bone mineral density compared with risedronate 5mg/d. To assess the antifracture efficacy of this regimen, data collected in the 2CDM study were analyzed using historical control data matched for key clinical characteristics from 2 placebo-controlled trials. Fracture rates in historical groups were compared with those of the 2CDM study treatment groups. At 12mo, vertebral fractures occurred in 5.1% and 1.0% of the placebo and 5-mg risedronate historical patients, respectively. In the risedronate 5mg/d and 75mg 2CDM groups, fracture incidence was 1.5% and 1.1%, respectively. Based on comparisons with the historical control group, risedronate 75mg 2CDM appears as effective as the 5-mg/d dose in reducing the risk of new vertebral fractures in the first year of treatment. The use of appropriate historical control data may provide an alternative design to assess fracture effects in osteoporosis trials for which simultaneous placebo-controlled data are unavailable.

Key Words: Historical placebo control, postmenopausal osteoporosis, risedronate, vertebral fracture

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: Dr. Nelson B. Watts receives honoraria and consulting fees through the University of Cincinnati Bone Health and Osteoporosis Center and research support from Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and sanofi-aventis. Dr. Jacques P. Brown receives honoraria for lecturing and consultancies as well as grants and research support for clinical trials sponsored by sanofi-aventis Canada and Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Gary Cline was an employee of Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals. He also owns stock in Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals.

PII: S1094-6950(09)00234-0

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.09.005

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 56-62, January 2010