Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 43-50, January 2010

Diet, Body Composition, and Bone Mass in Well-Trained Cyclists

Rheumatology Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo-Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil

Received 2 August 2009; received in revised form 7 September 2009; accepted 8 September 2009. published online 30 November 2009.

Abstract 

Cycling is believed to be associated with low bone mass. In this study, we investigate food intake, body composition, and bone mass in well-trained young adult cyclists compared with those in sedentary controls. Four-day estimated diet records were used to study dietary intake in 31 cyclists and 28 sedentary controls (all male, 24yr old on average), together with maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), body composition, and bone mass measurements (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry). The VO2max values were twice as high as those in the cyclists, whereas no significant difference in bone mass was observed between cyclists and controls. A total of 10 cyclists and 9 controls had low bone mass. Total-body lean mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass were higher in cyclists (p<0.001), whereas percentage of body fat was lower (p<0.001) compared with that of the controls. Energy and macro- and micronutrient intake was higher in the cyclists than in the controls (p<0.01). Energy consumption was considered adequate in the cyclists, whereas lipid and protein intake was higher than the American College of Sports Medicine recommendation. Lipid consumption negatively correlated with bone mass in the athletes. Our results demonstrate that cycling was associated with greater aerobic conditioning and lean mass without significant association with bone mass compared with sedentary controls.

Key Words: Body composition, bone mass measurements, nutrition and cycling

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 There are no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1094-6950(09)00231-5

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.09.002

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 43-50, January 2010