Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 4 , Pages 450-455, October 2009

Cross-Calibration of iDXA and Prodigy on Spine and Femur Scans in Korean Adults

  • Yong Jun Choi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
  • ,
  • Byung Joo Lee

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
  • ,
  • Hyun Chae Lim

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
  • ,
  • Yoon-Sok Chung

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Yoon-Sok Chung, MD, PhD, CCD, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, San 5, Woncheon-Dong, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-Do 443-721, South Korea.

Received 20 June 2009; received in revised form 2 August 2009; accepted 2 August 2009. published online 08 October 2009.

Abstract 

In this study, the authors compared bone mineral density (BMD) determined using GE Lunar iDXA and Prodigy and derived cross-calibration equations for the 2 devices in Korean adults. One hundred subjects (66 women and 34 men) participated in this study. Bone mineral density of spine and femur was measured by iDXA and Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (GE Lunar, Madison, WI). Subjects were divided into 3 groups. The first group (30 subjects) was scanned twice using Prodigy for precision testing and then once using iDXA. The second group (30 subjects) was scanned twice using iDXA and then once using Prodigy. Cross-calibration equations were derived using these results. The derived equations were tested in the third group (40 subjects). Predicted values from calculations based on Prodigy findings were compared with measured iDXA data. A significant difference was found between the BMD determined using the 2 devices (p<0.001). However, linear regression analysis showed a high level of agreement between the two (r2 from 0.984 to 0.994, p<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant correlations between Prodigy and iDXA. Cross-calibration equations decreased systematic errors between Prodigy and iDXA by 0.4% at the spine, 0.8% at the femoral neck, and 0.1% at the total femur. A high level of agreement was found between Prodigy and iDXA in Korean adults. Cross-calibration equations proved reliable based on comparisons of measured and calculated BMD values.

Key Words: Cross-calibration, DXA, iDXA, Korean, Prodigy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(09)00227-3

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.08.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 4 , Pages 450-455, October 2009