Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 4 , Pages 417-427, October 2009

25-Hydroxyvitamin D Measurement, 2009: A Review for Clinicians

  • Neil Binkley

      Affiliations

    • Osteoporosis Clinical Center and Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Neil Binkley, MD, University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Research Program, 2870 University Avenue, Suite 100, Madison, WI 53705.
  • ,
  • Diane Krueger

      Affiliations

    • Osteoporosis Clinical Center and Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • ,
  • Gary Lensmeyer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

Received 7 March 2009; received in revised form 5 June 2009; accepted 5 June 2009. published online 07 September 2009.

Abstract 

As clinicians are more widely appreciating the endemic nature of low vitamin D status, measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), the accepted measure of vitamin D status, has increased. Challenges to 25(OH)D measurement include the presence of 2 forms of vitamin D—ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol (vitamin D2 and vitamin D3, respectively)— and the hydrophobic nature of vitamin D. The current state of 25(OH)D measurement is reviewed; modest differences between methodologies persist and confound the application of a single cut point (e.g., 30ng/mL/75nmol/L) for the diagnosis of low vitamin D status. The absence of standard calibrators contributes to between-laboratory differences in 25(OH)D measurement. Until there is improved assay standardization and subsequent evidence-based consensus, it seems premature to recommend widespread screening 25(OH)D measurement. Selectively obtaining 25(OH)D measurement in individuals at clinical risk for vitamin D deficiency and/or those most likely to promptly experience benefits from supplementation seems appropriate.

Key Words: Measurement, 25(OH)D, Vitamin D

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(09)00151-6

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.06.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 4 , Pages 417-427, October 2009