Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 3 , Pages 287-291, July 2009

Implementation of Osteoporosis Screening Guidelines in Prostate Cancer Patients on Androgen Ablation

  • Lindsay S. Van Tongeren

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Lindsay S. Van Tongeren, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of British Columbia, Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Center, 10th floor, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  • ,
  • Graeme G. Duncan

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endocrinology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  • ,
  • David L. Kendler

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
  • ,
  • Howard Pai

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada

Received 7 December 2008; received in revised form 20 April 2009; accepted 2 May 2009. published online 22 June 2009.

Abstract 

Androgen ablation (AA) therapy is one of the modalities used to treat prostate cancer. It is well known that AA therapy increases the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. In 2004, the British Columbia Cancer Agency published guidelines regarding bone health in these patients. A key recommendation was to arrange for bone mineral density (BMD) testing if AA was to be used for 6mo or longer. Our objective was to evaluate how well these guidelines were implemented by reviewing the number of BMDs performed in patients who had been treated at one of the 4 cancer centers in British Columbia. We found that the overall number of BMDs documented after the implementation of the guidelines was significantly greater than the number documented before (25% vs 7.5%, p value<0.0001). There appeared to be regional differences in implementation, with the greatest effect seen at the Vancouver center, which serves as the chief academic center for the province. The greater effect of guidelines at this center suggests a need for more effective dissemination peripherally. The care gap remaining at even the most impacted center indicates a need for greater efforts to both implement guidelines and monitor their implementation over time.

Key Words: Androgen ablation therapy, bone mineral density, clinical guidelines implementation, osteoporosis screening, prostate cancer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(09)00147-4

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.05.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 3 , Pages 287-291, July 2009