Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 3 , Pages 337-344, July 2009

Bone Mineral Density Measurement at Both Spine and Hip for Diagnosing Osteoporosis in Japanese Patients

  • Shota Ikegami

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Shota Ikegami, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan
  • ,
  • Mikio Kamimura

      Affiliations

    • Center for Osteoporosis and Spinal Disorders, Kamimura Orthopaedic Clinic, Matsumoto 399-0021, Japan
  • ,
  • Shigeharu Uchiyama

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan
  • ,
  • Hiroyuki Nakagawa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Suwa Red Cross Hospital, Suwa 392-8510, Japan
  • ,
  • Hiroyuki Hashidate

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan
  • ,
  • Kenji Takahara

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ina Central Hospital, Ina 396-8555, Japan
  • ,
  • Hiroyuki Kato

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan

Received 28 January 2009; received in revised form 9 March 2009; accepted 9 March 2009. published online 22 June 2009.

Abstract 

In Japan, spinal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been commonly performed for diagnosing osteoporosis but scanning the proximal femur is not done widely. The latest Japanese guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, revised in 2006, recommend bone mineral density (BMD) measurement at both spine and hip for diagnosing osteoporosis, although there have been no reports that proved the necessity of those measurements. One thousand forty-one women and 485 men with clinical suspicion of osteoporosis were enrolled in this study, and DXA was performed at both spine and hip. The proportions of the patients who had inconsistency between diagnosis of osteoporosis from spinal DXA and that of hip were estimated. As a result, 22% of women and 15% of men had an inconsistency with the diagnosis of osteoporosis using DXA at each measurement site. There was inconsistency in diagnosing osteoporosis using DXA at the spine and proximal femur measurement sites. Because spine and femoral DXA measurements complement each other in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, BMD measurement at both spine and hip should be performed for all Japanese patients who are suspected osteoporosis, regardless of age and sex.

Key Words: Bone mineral density, densitometry, diagnosis, Japanese, osteoporosis, T-score

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(09)00119-X

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.03.099

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 3 , Pages 337-344, July 2009