Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 3 , Pages 267-271, July 2009

The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: Perceptions and Commentary

  • E. Michael Lewiecki

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: E. Michael Lewiecki, MD, FACP, FACE, New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, 300 Oak Street NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106.
    • New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
  • ,
  • Sanford Baim

      Affiliations

    • Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, CO, USA
  • ,
  • Craig B. Langman

      Affiliations

    • Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
    • Division of Kidney Diseases, Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • John P. Bilezikian

      Affiliations

    • College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Received 3 March 2009; accepted 4 March 2009. published online 22 June 2009.

Abstract 

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) periodically issues Official Positions (OPs) on the assessment of skeletal health in adults and children. OPs are recommendations regarding topics that include nomenclature, indications, acquisition, analysis, quality control, interpretation, reporting, and clinical utility of measuring bone density using different technologies. The purpose of these directives is to assist health care professionals in the practice of clinical densitometry. The OPs are established through a rigorous process of scientific literature review by ISCD task forces, each assigned to address a group of clinically relevant questions. The findings and recommendations of each task force are assessed and revised, as needed, by an international panel of experts. Recommendations that are felt to be appropriate for inclusion as ISCD OPs are sent to the ISCD Board of Directors for final approval. Despite having a major impact in the clinical application of bone densitometry, the ISCD OPs have not been universally adopted, in part because of misunderstanding of the process used to establish them and the way that they are intended for use in clinical practice. This is a review of the benefits and limitations of the ISCD OPs with emphasis on areas of controversy.

Key Words: DXA, evidence-based medicine, osteoporosis, quality, QUS

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(09)00118-8

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.03.098

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 3 , Pages 267-271, July 2009