Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 162-169 , April 2009

Analysis of ISCD-NIST Survey for Bone Health

  • Andrew Dienstfrey

      Affiliations

    • Mathematics and Computational Sciences Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Andrew Dienstfrey, PhD, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Math and Computational Sciences Division, 325 Broadway, Mail Stop 891.01, Boulder, CO 80305-3328.
  • ,
  • Tammy Oreskovic

      Affiliations

    • Mathematics and Computational Sciences Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, USA
  • ,
  • Herbert Bennett

      Affiliations

    • Materials Reliability Division, Semiconductor Electronics Division and the Ionizing Radiation Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
  • ,
  • Lawrence Hudson

      Affiliations

    • Materials Reliability Division, Semiconductor Electronics Division and the Ionizing Radiation Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

Received 29 August 2008 ,Revised 11 December 2008 ,Accepted 12 December 2008.

References 

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . Assessing the risk of bone disease and fracture. In: Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2004;p. 208;Office of the Surgeon General
  2. Bennett HS, Dienstfrey A, Hudson LT, et al. Standards and measurements for assessing bone health-workshop report co-sponsored by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:399–405
  3. Arrow KJ. Social choice and individual values. 2nd ed.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1963;
  4. Kitchenham B, Pfleeger S. Principles of survey research part 6: data analysis. ACM SIGSOFT Software Eng Notes. 2003;28:24–27
  5. Lehmann EL. Nonparametrics: statistical methods based on ranks. In: Holden Day series in probability and statistics. San Francisco, CA: Holden Day; 1975;
  6. Saari DG. Decisions and elections: explaining the unexpected. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2001;
  7. Young HP, Levenglick A. Consistent extension of condorcets election principle. SIAM J Appl Math. 1978;35:285–300
  8. Kanis JA, on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group. 2008 Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level [Technical Report]. World Health Organization, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK.
  9. Friedman M. A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of m rankings. Ann Math Stat. 1940;11:86–92
  10. Kendall MG, Smith BB. The problem of m rankings. Ann Math Stat. 1939;10:275–287

 This article is a contribution of the US National Institute of Standards and Technology and is not subject to copyright.

PII: S1094-6950(08)00513-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.12.005

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 162-169 , April 2009