Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 224-228, April 2009

Is the NHANES III Femoral Neck Database Discordant With the Total Hip and Trochanteric Region Databases?

  • Paul G. Rochmis

      Affiliations

    • Bone Densitometry Center, 3027 Javier Road, Fairfax, VA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Paul G. Rochmis, MD, FACP, FACR, Bone Densitometry Center, 3027 Javier Road, Fairfax, VA 22031-4607.
  • ,
  • Michael J. Sheridan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
  • ,
  • Leslie Perry

      Affiliations

    • Bone Densitometry Center, 3027 Javier Road, Fairfax, VA, USA

Received 12 May 2008; received in revised form 1 December 2008; accepted 1 December 2008. published online 02 February 2009.

Abstract 

The results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing frequently leads to a significant clinical treatment decision, based on T-score or Z-score results. Using the nearly universally accepted World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, which in turn are based on the validity of the population database, a flawed database may lead to an incorrect and deleterious clinical categorization. We have observed that the Hologic National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III) femoral neck scores are frequently disproportionately low compared with scores in the other major hip regions and that the discordance is statistically significant. Although the WHO now uses the femoral neck T-score (in postmenopausal women and men 50 yr or older), many clinicians still use the lowest (worst) T-score in any 1 of 3 major scan regions—femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine—suggesting that patient misclassification may occur, leading to the potential for unnecessary pharmacologic intervention.

Key Words: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, fracture risk, NHANES III database

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(08)00507-6

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2008.12.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 224-228, April 2009