Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 186-194, April 2009

Bone and Muscle Parameters of the Tibia: Agreement Between the XCT 2000 and XCT 3000 Instruments

  • Melonie Burrows

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
    • Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. Melonie Burrows, PhD, Department of Orthopaedics and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Room 589 Research Pavilion, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L8, Canada.
  • ,
  • David M.L. Cooper

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • ,
  • Danmei Liu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
    • Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
  • ,
  • Heather A. McKay

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
    • Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada

Received 18 August 2008; received in revised form 30 September 2008; accepted 30 September 2008. published online 12 November 2008.

Abstract 

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography is a valuable tool to assess bone in children across growth, with long-term studies capturing nuances missed in cross-sectional studies. As children grow, a change from XCT 2000 to a XCT 3000 may be required to accommodate the increasing size of the lower limbs. We examined the precision and agreement between the Stratec XCT 2000 and 3000 on selected bone and muscle parameters. Twenty-eight participants (mean±SD; age 27.5±6.5yr) underwent scans at the distal (8%), mid (50%), and proximal (66%) tibia sites, to assess total bone area, total bone density, and trabecular density (8% site); and total bone area, cortical area, cortical density (CoD), polar strength-strain index, and muscle cross-sectional area (50% and 66% sites). Outcomes between instruments were highly correlated; r=0.90–0.99 for CoD across sites, with r=0.97–0.99 for all other measures. Bland and Altman plots showed excellent agreement between instruments for all variables. Regression indicated no significant relationship between instrument and size of measurement (p>0.05). Coefficients of variation were lower than previously reported (0.4–2.4%). For longitudinal studies, the XCT 3000 can replace the XCT 2000 with minimal influence on bone and muscle parameters.

Key Words: Bone geometry, bone strength, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, tibia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Sources of funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Professor McKay is a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research's Senior Scholar.

PII: S1094-6950(08)00448-4

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2008.09.005

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 186-194, April 2009