Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 4 , Pages 485-493.e3, October 2008

Using Risk Factors and Quantitative Ultrasound to Identify Postmenopausal Caucasian Women at Risk of Osteoporosis

  • Enda Minnock

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Laboratories, Department of Materials and Applied Science, Cranfield University, Swindon, UK
  • ,
  • Richard Cook

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Otago University, Dunedin, New Zealand
  • ,
  • David Collins

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rheumatology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
  • ,
  • Julie Tucker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
  • ,
  • Peter Zioupos

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Laboratories, Department of Materials and Applied Science, Cranfield University, Swindon, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. Peter Zioupos, Materials and Applied Science, Cranfield University, DCMT, Shrivenham, Swindon, Wiltshire SN6 8LA, United Kingdom.

Received 11 January 2008; received in revised form 4 April 2008; accepted 7 April 2008. published online 01 July 2008.

Abstract 

There is a need to prescreen large numbers of individuals for osteoporosis due to current demands on clinical resources. Some previous attempts to predict individuals at risk have used simple indices based on patient information, or Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) and have shown good sensitivity but also demonstrated low specificity, which means that many individuals with good bone mineral density were also selected. The aim of this study was to determine if a tool based on a combination of risk factors and QUS measurements could also be made to provide improved specificity. A risk factors measurement questionnaire was created and completed for a sample of Caucasian postmenopausal women (n=235) who had undergone Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning. QUS measurements were also taken at various skeletal sites. Assessment tools were generated using stepwise regression to predict osteoporosis, evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves, and assessed using area under the curve values. Specificity values were determined at a sensitivity of 0.90 to establish the comparative utility of each assessment tool. Using only a risk factors model the specificities were 0.28 at the lumbar spine, 0.45 for the femoral neck and 0.68 for the total hip. In a risk factors+QUS data model the specificities measured were 0.44 for the lumbar spine, 0.78 for the femoral neck, and 0.84 for the total hip. These novel assessment tools can identify those with low bone mineral density at a number of skeletal sites and help towards avoiding many unnecessary investigations in the future.

Key Words: Bone mineral density, osteoporosis, quantitative ultrasound, questionnaires, risk factors

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(08)00039-5

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2008.04.002

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 4 , Pages 485-493.e3, October 2008