Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 4 , Pages 503-510, October 2008

Muscle Mass Is More Strongly Related to Hip Bone Mineral Density Than Is Quadriceps Strength or Lower Activity Level in Adults Over Age 50Year

  • Neil A. Segal

      Affiliations

    • University of Iowa and VA Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Neil A Segal, MD, Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, University of Iowa and VA Medical Center, 200 Hawkins Drive, 0728 JPP, Iowa City, IA 52242-1088.
  • ,
  • James C. Torner

      Affiliations

    • University of Iowa and VA Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, USA
  • ,
  • Mei Yang

      Affiliations

    • Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Jeffrey R. Curtis

      Affiliations

    • Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
  • ,
  • David T. Felson

      Affiliations

    • Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Michael C. Nevitt

      Affiliations

    • University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • ,
  • for the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study Group

Received 10 January 2008; received in revised form 1 March 2008; accepted 2 March 2008. published online 06 May 2008.

Abstract 

This cross-sectional study examined whether reduced hip bone mineral density (BMD) is better explained by isokinetic knee extensor strength (KES), lower limb lean body mass (L-LBM), or Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Through population-based recruitment, 1543 adults without knee osteoarthritis were recruited. For men and women respectively, means±SD were age 60.8±8.0 and 61.1±7.9yr; body mass index 29.6±4.6 and 29.1±5.4kg/m2; hip BMD 1.025±0.138 and 0.895±0.128g/cm2; KES 124.9±41 and 72.7±22.9N·m; L-LBM 10.3±1.5 and 7.0±1.2kg; and PASE 206.4±99.7 and 163.8±77.0. The relationship between BMD and KES in men (r2=0.21, p0.002) and women (r=0.23, p<0.001) was significant before adjustment. However, this association was no longer significant after controlling for L-LBM. Even after controlling for age, race, and sex, the association between BMD and KES was better explained by L-LBM (partial R2=0.14, p<0.001) than by PASE (partial R2=0.00). Allometric scaling of KES to body size attenuated the association of BMD with KES (Std Beta=0.03). The significant association between BMD and L-LBM (Std Beta=0.36) remained stronger than that between BMD and weight (Std Beta=0.21). Therefore, muscle mass accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in hip BMD than KES or activity level and explained a significant proportion of the association between weight and BMD.

Key Words: Allometric scaling, bone mineral density, muscle mass, physical activity level, quadriceps strength, rehabilitation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was funded by NIA grants to the following organizations: Boston University (David Felson, MD, 1 U01 AG18820); University of Iowa (James Torner, PhD, 1 U01 AG18832); University of Alabama (Cora E. Lewis, MD, MSPH, 1 U01 AG18947); University of California San Francisco (Michael Nevitt, PhD, 1 U01 AG19069); and NICHD through the Association of Academic Physiatrists (Neil Segal, MD, 5K12HD001097-08).

PII: S1094-6950(08)00036-X

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2008.03.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 4 , Pages 503-510, October 2008