Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 367-372, July 2008

A Novel DXA-Based Hip Failure Index Captures Hip Fragility Independent of BMD

  • H. Sievänen

      Affiliations

    • Bone Research Group, UKK Institute, Tampere, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. H. Sievänen, ScD, Bone Research Group, UKK Institute, P.O.B 30, FI-33501, Tampere, Finland.
  • ,
  • L.S. Weynand

      Affiliations

    • GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA
  • ,
  • W.K. Wacker

      Affiliations

    • GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA
  • ,
  • C. Simonelli

      Affiliations

    • HealthEast Clinics, Woodbury, MN, USA
  • ,
  • P.K. Burke

      Affiliations

    • Osteoporosis Diagnostic and Treatment Center, Richmond, VA, USA
  • ,
  • S. Ragi

      Affiliations

    • Centro de Diagnõstico e Pesquisa da Osteoporose do Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil
  • ,
  • L. Del Rio

      Affiliations

    • CETIR Centre Medic, Barcelona, Spain

Received 19 September 2007; received in revised form 25 February 2008; accepted 25 February 2008. published online 06 May 2008.

Abstract 

Capability of a novel dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based hip failure index (HiFI) to discriminate between hip fracture cases and controls was evaluated. Given the constraints of planar DXA, the femoral neck was assumed a foam-filled (∼trabecular bone), thin-walled (∼cortical bone) sandwich structure, while HiFI estimated the critical force sufficient to buckle the wall of such a structure. Proximal femur DXA data from 1379 women aged 65yr and older, 268 with prior hip fracture were used. Comparison between standard areal bone mineral density (BMD), femur strength index (FSI), and HiFI was based on areas under receiver operatoring characteristic curves (AUC). The mean femoral neck BMD (SD) was 0.689 (0.109) g/cm2 among the cases and 0.768 (0.119) g/cm2 among the controls; the mean FSI 1.33 (0.36) and 1.54 (0.41), and the mean HiFI −0.28 (0.14) and −0.18 (0.15), respectively; all intergroup differences were highly significant (p<0.001). The intergroup difference for HiFI remained significant (p<0.002) after adjusting for age and BMD or FSI. The AUCs were 0.696 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.661–0.730) for BMD, 0.665 (0.630–0.700) for FSI, and 0.701 (0.666–0.736) for HiFI. In conclusion, HiFI may capture structural traits that account for femoral neck fragility independently of BMD or FSI. Obviously, the use of actual geometric and structural information from three-dimensional imaging of the femoral neck would help diminish the crude assumptions of the present DXA approach and reveal the true potential of the HiFI approach to gauge hip fragility and identify at-risk individuals for hip fractures.

Key Words: Bone density, cortical buckling, hip fracture, osteoporosis, trabecular bone

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(08)00032-2

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2008.02.005

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 367-372, July 2008