Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 424-430, July 2008

Site-Specific Variation of Bone Micro-Architecture in the Distal Radius and Tibia

  • Steven K. Boyd

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. Steven K. Boyd, PhD, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Received 28 September 2007; received in revised form 10 December 2007; accepted 11 December 2007. published online 15 February 2008.

Abstract 

High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography measures 3-dimensional bone micro-architecture at the distal radius and tibia, and provides new insight issues of bone quality in patients. The typical measurement region of interest (ROI) with an axial dimension of 9.02mm is positioned at a fixed distance from landmarks at the distal end of the radius or tibia, but little is known about the variation of bone architecture in the vicinity of this region and related sensitivity to measurement location. Variation in ROI position can lead to differences in quantitative outcomes, and this is compounded when reference landmarks are difficult for an operator to discern. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the site-specific variation in bone micro-architecture at the human distal radius and tibia, and the impact of variation of the ROI position. Using cadavers, a 27.06-mm axial ROI including the typical clinical measurement site was scanned, and the variation of morphological (apparent density, trabecular density, trabecular number, and cortical thickness) and biomechanical (polar moment of inertia, cross-sectional area) indices were assessed along the 27.06mm length. It was found that the radius has more site-specific variation than the tibia. Furthermore, the shifting of the 9.02mm clinical ROI position by ±0.5mm resulted in approximately a 2% and 6% error in the tibia and radius density, respectively. For longitudinal assessment of bone architecture, site-specific variation is not as critical because comparisons are made within an individual; however, site-specific variation is an important consideration for cross-section studies and assessment of individuals against a normative population database.

Key Words: Architecture, bone, HR-pQCT, radius, tibia, variation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(07)00262-4

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.013

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 424-430, July 2008