Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 232-236, April 2008

Comparison of DXA Hip Structural Analysis with Volumetric QCT

  • Sven Prevrhal

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Sven Prevrhal, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107.
  • ,
  • John A. Shepherd

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Kenneth G. Faulkner

      Affiliations

    • Synarc, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Ken W. Gaither

      Affiliations

    • Synarc, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Dennis M. Black

      Affiliations

    • San Francisco Coordinating Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Thomas F. Lang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA

Received 7 August 2007; received in revised form 5 December 2007; accepted 5 December 2007. published online 18 February 2008.

Abstract 

Hip structural analysis (HSA) estimates geometrical and mechanical properties from hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images and is widely used in osteoporosis trials. This study compares HSA to volumetric quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements in the same population. A total of 121 women (mean age 58yr, mean body mass index 27kg/m2) participated. Each woman received a volumetric QCT scan and DXA scan of the left hip. QCT scans were analyzed with in-house software that directly computed geometric and mechanical parameters at the neck and trochanteric regions. DXA HSA was performed with an implementation by GE/Lunar. Pair-wise linear regression of HSA variables was conducted by method to site matched QCT variables for bone density, cross-sectional area, and cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) of the femur neck. HSA correlated well with QCT (r2=0.67 for neck bone mineral density [BMD] and 0.5 for CSMI) and standard DXA at the neck (r2=0.82 for BMD). HSA and volumetric QCT compared favorably, which supports the validity of a projective technique such as DXA to derive geometrical properties of the proximal hip.

Key Words: Bone densitometry, femur, hip structural analysis, osteoporosis, quantitative computed tomography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(07)00261-2

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 232-236, April 2008