Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 163-187, January 2008

Quantitative Ultrasound in the Management of Osteoporosis: The 2007 ISCD Official Positions

  • Marc-Antoine Krieg

      Affiliations

    • Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
    • Task Force Chair.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Marc-Antoine Krieg, MD, Center of Bone Diseases, Bone and Joint Department – CHUV, Av. Pierre-Decker 4, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • ,
  • Reinhart Barkmann

      Affiliations

    • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Stefano Gonnelli

      Affiliations

    • University of Siena, Siena, Italy
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Alison Stewart

      Affiliations

    • University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Douglas C. Bauer

      Affiliations

    • University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Luis Del Rio Barquero

      Affiliations

    • Cetir Centre Medic, Barcelona, Spain
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Jonathan J. Kaufman

      Affiliations

    • CyberLogic, Inc., New York, NY, USA
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Roman Lorenc

      Affiliations

    • Specjalistyczny Osrodek Medycyny Wieku, Warsaw, Poland
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Paul D. Miller

      Affiliations

    • Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, CO, USA
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Wojciech P. Olszynski

      Affiliations

    • University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Catalina Poiana

      Affiliations

    • “Carol Davila” University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • Anne-Marie Schott

      Affiliations

    • Edouard Herriot Hospital, INSERM U 403, Lyon, France
    • Task Force Member.
  • ,
  • E. Michael Lewiecki

      Affiliations

    • New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
    • Task Force Liaison.
  • ,
  • Didier Hans

      Affiliations

    • Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
    • Task Force Member.
    • Task Force Liaison.

Received 5 December 2007; accepted 5 December 2007.

Abstract 

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is commonly used in the care of patients for diagnostic classification of osteoporosis, low bone mass (osteopenia), or normal bone density; assessment of fracture risk; and monitoring changes in bone density over time. The development of other technologies for the evaluation of skeletal health has been associated with uncertainties regarding their applications in clinical practice. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), a technology for measuring properties of bone at peripheral skeletal sites, is more portable and less expensive than DXA, without the use of ionizing radiation. The proliferation of QUS devices that are technologically diverse, measuring and reporting variable bone parameters in different ways, examining different skeletal sites, and having differing levels of validating data for association with DXA-measured bone density and fracture risk, has created many challenges in applying QUS for use in clinical practice. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) 2007 Position Development Conference (PDC) addressed clinical applications of QUS for fracture risk assessment, diagnosis of osteoporosis, treatment initiation, monitoring of treatment, and quality assurance/quality control. The ISCD Official Positions on QUS resulting from this PDC, the rationale for their establishment, and recommendations for further study are presented here.

Key Words: Diagnosis, fracture, guidelines, osteoporosis, QUS, recommendations, standards, treatment, ultrasound

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(07)00259-4

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.011

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 163-187, January 2008