Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 211-220, April 2008

Reproducibility and Sources of Variability in Radiographic Texture Analysis of Densitometric Calcaneal Images

  • Tamara J. Vokes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Tamara J. Vokes, MD, Section of Endocrinology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland, MC 1027, Chicago, IL 60637.
  • ,
  • Ann Pham

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Joel Wilkie

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Masha Kocherginsky

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Siu-Ling Ma

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Michael Chinander

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Theodore Karrison

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Octavia Bris
  • ,
  • Maryellen L. Giger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

Received 26 February 2007; received in revised form 11 September 2007; accepted 24 October 2007. published online 03 January 2008.

Abstract 

Radiographic texture analysis (RTA) is a computerized analysis of the spatial pattern of radiographic images used as a way of evaluating bone structure. We have shown that RTA performed on high-resolution heel images obtained using a portable densitometer differentiates subjects with and without osteoporotic fractures. In the present study, short-term precision of RTA was examined on densitometric heel images obtained from 33 subjects scanned 8 times each, with 3 observers placing a region of interest (ROI) 3 times on each image. The long-term precision was examined on images obtained from 10 subjects 3 times on each of 3days separated by 1week, with 2 observers placing an ROI on each image. The RTA features examined included the root mean square (RMS) variation, a measure of the contrast between the light and dark areas of the image, the first moment of the power spectrum, a measure of the spatial frequency of the trabecular pattern, and Minkowski fractal (MINK), a measure of roughness/smoothness of the trabecular pattern. The precision of the RTA features expressed as coefficient of variation ranged between the lowest of 0.5–0.7% for MINK and the highest of 14–16% for RMS. The short- and long-term precision was similar, and was not significantly influenced by repositioning and rescanning, or by ROI placement by the same or different observers. Significant sources of variability of RTA were the between-subject differences and differences between regions of the heel, but not differences due to repositioning, rescanning in the same position, or ROI placement by the same or different observers. We conclude that technical aspects of image acquisition and processing are adequate to allow further development of RTA of the densitometric images for clinical application as a method for noninvasive assessment of bone structure.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding support: supported by grants K23 AR048205-01A1, AR42739-S1, and AR42739 from the National Institute of Health.Presented in part at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

PII: S1094-6950(07)00238-7

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.10.004

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 211-220, April 2008