Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 221-231, April 2008

Vertebral Fracture Diagnosis in the Multinational BONE Study of Oral Ibandronate: Quality Management in Radiology

  • Gabriele Armbrecht

      Affiliations

    • Center of Muscle and Bone Research, Charite—Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Gabriele Armbrecht, Center of Muscle and Bone Research, Charite—Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany.
  • ,
  • Tilo Blenk

      Affiliations

    • Center of Muscle and Bone Research, Charite—Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • Charles H. Chesnut III

      Affiliations

    • Osteoporosis Research Group, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
  • ,
  • Jill C. Gardner

      Affiliations

    • Osteoporosis Research Group, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
  • ,
  • Gabriele von Ingersleben

      Affiliations

    • Synarc, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Paul Mahoney

      Affiliations

    • F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Dieter Felsenberg

      Affiliations

    • Center of Muscle and Bone Research, Charite—Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany

Received 19 July 2007; received in revised form 5 October 2007; accepted 5 October 2007. published online 03 January 2008.

Abstract 

A multicenter trial has established the antifracture efficacy of oral daily (2.5mg) as well as intermittent (20mg every other day for 12 doses every 3mo) ibandronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. As diagnostic spinal radiographs for this trial were read at 2 centers, the study protocol included rigorous procedures for diagnosis of morphometric vertebral fractures. These included standardized qualitative and morphometric assessment methods for diagnosing vertebral osteoporotic fractures and consensus cross-validation procedures for maximizing fracture diagnostic accuracy and consistency between the 2 radiographic reading centers. Using these stringent measures, the between-center discrepancy in the diagnosis of prevalent fractures was only 8%. Furthermore, after cross-validation, discrepancy in the final diagnosis of incident fractures between centers was found for only 4 patients, resulting in a net gain of only 2 fractures in the trial. This meticulous methodology provided a highly effective means of identifying vertebral fractures and recruiting the trial population in which to assess the efficacy of ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Key Words: Diagnosis, ibandronate, morphometric, postmenopausal osteoporosis, qualitative, vertebral fracture

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(07)00212-0

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.10.002

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 221-231, April 2008