« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 3
, Pages 306-311
, July 2007
Cross Calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE Lunar Prodigy for Forearm Bone Mineral Density Measurements
References
- . Which central dual X-ray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis?. J Clin Densitom. 2002;5(Suppl):S11–S18
- . Bone measurements in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism. Bone. 1998;22:565–570
- . Diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal women, and children. J Clin Densitom. 2004;7:17–26
- Calcium supplementation and bone mineral density in females from childhood to young adulthood: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:175–188
- . Cortical and trabecular bone at the forearm show different adaptation patterns in response to tennis playing. J Clin Densitom. 2004;7:399–405
- Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss: six-year results from the Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:4879–4885
- Bone density changes in Paget's disease 2 years after iv pamidronate: profound, sustained increases in pagetic bone with severity-related loss in forearm nonpagetic cortical bone. Bone. 2003;32:56–61
- Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9(9):1425–1427
- . Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements. Bone. 1995;16(3):385–390
- . Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam system. Br J Radiol. 1996;69(822):522–531
- Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral. J Clin Densitom. 2004;7(3):281–289
- . Impact of using the ultradistal radius region of interest on diagnostic classification. J Clin Densitom. 2004;7:143–152
- . A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(12):948–954
- . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310
- . A multivariate approach for the biometric comparison of analytical methods in clinical chemistry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1981;19(3):121–137
- . Cross calibration of DXA as part of an equipment replacement program. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:287–294
- . Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:119–123
- European semi-anthropomorphic phantom for the cross-calibration of peripheral bone densitometers: assessment of precision accuracy and stability. Bone Miner. 1994;27:109–120
- . A phantom for standardization and quality control in peripheral bone measurements by PQCT and DXA. Phys Med Biol. 1993;38:1963–1970
- . Bone mineral density measures in longitudinal studies: the choice of phantom is crucial for quality assessment. The Tromso study, a population-based study. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:1597–1603
- . Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:14–19
PII: S1094-6950(07)00174-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.05.003
© 2007 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 3
, Pages 306-311
, July 2007
