Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 132-137, April 2007

Diagnostic Agreement at the Total Hip Using Different DXA Systems and the NHANES III Database

  • Gary M. Kiebzak

      Affiliations

    • Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Gary M. Kiebzak, PhD, Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, St. Luke's Belmont Center, 2909 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77025.
  • ,
  • Neil Binkley

      Affiliations

    • University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Center and Research Program, Madison, WI
  • ,
  • E. Michael Lewiecki

      Affiliations

    • New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM
  • ,
  • Paul D. Miller

      Affiliations

    • Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, CO

Received 8 August 2006; received in revised form 6 February 2007; accepted 12 February 2007. published online 11 April 2007.

Abstract 

In 1997, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III) total hip reference database was adopted for T-score derivation in an effort to optimize diagnostic agreement among densitometers from different manufacturers. Our study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of the NHANES III standardized database at achieving agreement in diagnostic classification (normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis) based on total hip T-scores comparing 2 different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems. This was a retrospective analysis of standard bilateral hip and lumbar spine scans done in duplicate for 60 women scanned on both a GE Lunar Prodigy and Hologic Delphi DXA system. Classification based on lumbar spine T-scores using manufacturer-specific databases was also compared as no standardized lumbar spine reference database exists. Subject's mean age was 62yr (range: 47–83yr). There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic classification between DXA systems (Prodigy vs Delphi), with agreement (same women classified same way) of 92% at the left total hip. Agreement was 100% when T-scores were greater than or equal to −0.8 and less than or equal to −1.2. There was 90% agreement between DXA systems at the lumbar spine. For both hip and spine, all diagnostic discrepancies occurred when the T-scores were at or near transition thresholds between normal and osteopenia or osteopenia and osteoporosis. The difference in mean T-scores between DXA systems at left total hip was 0.11 vs 0.32 for lumbar spine (p less than 0.001). Use of the NHANES III standardized database results in good diagnostic agreement at total hip between Prodigy and Delphi.

Key Words: DXA, osteoporosis, reference database, T-score

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(07)00035-2

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.02.003

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 132-137, April 2007