« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 2
, Pages 165-169
, April 2007
Bilateral Femoral Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Chinese Women and Men
References
- . Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;12:24–35
- Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization task-force for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:259–264
- . Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet. 2002;359:1929–1936
- . Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 1996;312:1254–1259
- . Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. 1995;5:377–381
- . Correlations between bone mineral density of the hand and other skeletal sites as measured by DXA in Chinese women and men. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:461–468
- . Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA systems. Calcif Tissue Int. 1995;56:26–31
- . Right and left proximal femur analyses: is there a need to do both?. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;58:307–310
- . Symmetry of bone mineral density at the proximal femur with emphasis on the effect of side dominance. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;61:189–191
- . An investigation of the diagnostic value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density measurements. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:675–679
- . Is there a difference between right and left femoral bone density?. J Clin Densitom. 2000;3:57–61
- . The effect of measurement of the contralateral hip if the spine is not included in the bone mineral density analysis. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:210–216
- . A comparison study of the reference curves of bone mineral density at different skeletal sites in native Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;73:122–132
- . Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Densitom. 2004;7:1–6
- Improved performance of hip DXA using a novel region of interest in the upper part of the femoral neck: in vitro study using bone strength as a standard of reference. J Clin Densitom. 2005;8:488–494
- Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:31–36
- . Improving femoral bone density measurements. J Clin Densitom. 2003;6:353–358
- . Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1303–1308
- Different morphometric and densitometric parameters predict cervical and trochanteric hip fracture: the EPIDOS study. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:1895–1902
- . The population burden of fractures originates in women with osteopenia, not osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1404–1409
- . What is the role of serial bone mineral density measurements in patient management?. J Clin Densitom. 2002;5:S29–S38
- Application of the 1994 WHO classification to populations other than postmenopausal Caucasian women: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:22–30
PII: S1094-6950(07)00024-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.01.006
© 2007 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 2
, Pages 165-169
, April 2007
