Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 165-169, April 2007

Bilateral Femoral Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Chinese Women and Men

Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

Received 12 October 2006; received in revised form 21 January 2007; accepted 21 January 2007. published online 13 March 2007.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to assess the contralateral femoral bone mineral density (BMD) difference as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in mainland Chinese women and men. We measured bilateral proximal femora (i.e., total hip, femoral neck, upper femoral neck, and trochanter) using DXA in 1101 subjects (284 males, 817 females), among whom 504 were postmenopausal. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Student's t-tests, and Pearson's correlation coefficients (r). With bilateral femur measurements and the acquisition of the mean BMD, precision error could be significantly reduced at the total hip, the femoral neck, and the upper femoral neck. Contralateral femoral BMD was highly correlated at all measuring sites (r=0.879–0.964). For the male group and for the postmenopausal subgroup, no significant differences in contralateral femoral BMDs were found. In the postmenopausal women, the percentage of subjects with discordance in classification (i.e., normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) for the left and right femora declined from 16.9% to 8.1% with precision adjustment. From a population perspective, since there may still be a considerable number of misdiagnosed cases, we therefore suggest that bilateral femur measurements may be justified for postmenopausal Chinese women.

Key Words: Bone mineral density, bilateral femora, Chinese, DXA, precision

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(07)00024-8

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.01.006

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 165-169, April 2007