Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 21-24, January 2007

Repeat Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Resulting From Reminder Letters For Women With a Baseline Abnormal DXA

  • Laura Shoemaker

      Affiliations

    • Departments of General Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • ,
  • Andrea Sikon

      Affiliations

    • Departments of General Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
    • Women's Health Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • ,
  • Anil Jain

      Affiliations

    • Departments of General Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • ,
  • Ashish Atreja

      Affiliations

    • Departments of General Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • ,
  • Bianca Falcone

      Affiliations

    • Women's Health Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • ,
  • Bradford J. Richmond

      Affiliations

    • Women's Health Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
    • Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • ,
  • Holly L. Thacker

      Affiliations

    • Departments of General Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
    • Women's Health Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Holly L. Thacker, MD, FACP, CCD, Director, Women's Health Center, Associate Professor CCLCM at CWRU, Cleveland Clinic/A10, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195.

Received 23 August 2006; received in revised form 1 December 2006; accepted 2 December 2006.

Abstract 

The objective was to assess the effects of reminder letters on women returning for repeat bone density. We queried our clinical data repository to identify all women undergoing dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) during the entire 2003 calendar year. Women with abnormal DXAs were entered into a database for reminder letters. The electronic medical record was then reviewed for the presence of the reminder letter and whether any repeat DXA scan was done. Approximately half of the women returned for repeat DXA of this group, approximately one-third were improved, one-third deteriorated, and the remaining were unchanged. We suggest a clinical benchmark of a minimum of 50% of women with abnormal bone density returning for repeat DXA on the same machine at a DXA imaging center should be a quality improvement goal. Further research into exploring why patients do not return for serial DXA and the impact of reminder letters on improving treatment outcomes should be conducted.

Key Words: Bone mineral density, DXA, quality improvement, osteopenia, postmenopausal osteoporosis, reminder letters

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(06)00310-6

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2006.12.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 21-24, January 2007