Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 65-75, January 2007

Bone Geometry, Density, and Strength Indices of the Distal Radius Reflect Loading via Childhood Gymnastic Activity

  • Jodi N. Dowthwaite

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Jodi N. Dowthwaite, PhD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, 550 Harrison Street, Suite 128, Syracuse, NY 13202.
  • ,
  • Portia P.E. Flowers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
  • ,
  • Joseph A. Spadaro

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
  • ,
  • Tamara A. Scerpella

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

Received 5 September 2006; received in revised form 13 October 2006; accepted 13 October 2006. published online 27 December 2006.

Abstract 

The distal radius bears unique forces during gymnastic activity. Its relatively simple anatomy, minimal soft tissue envelope, and varied composition make the distal radius ideal for evaluating the effects of loading on bone properties. For 56 premenarcheal gymnasts and nongymnasts, ultradistal and 1/3 distal radius DXA scans measured bone mineral content (BMC), areal bone mineral density, and projected area. Simplified geometric models were used to generate bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), geometric indices, strength indices, and fall strength ratios. Ratios of regional BMC vs total body fat-free mass (FFM) were calculated. Separate Tanner I and II analyses of covariance adjusted bone parameters for age and height. Ratios were compared using maturity-matched analyses of variance. At the 1/3 region, periosteal width, BMC, cortical cross-sectional area, and section modulus were greater in gymnasts than nongymnasts (p<0.05); 1/3 BMAD means were equivalent. Ultradistal BMAD, BMC, and index for structural strength in axial compression were higher in gymnasts than nongymnasts; ultradistal periosteal width was only larger in Tanner I gymnasts. Fall strength ratios and BMC/FFM ratios were greater in gymnasts (p<0.05). Geometric and volumetric responses to mechanical loading are site specific during late childhood and early adolescence.

Key Words: Bone density, bone size, exercise, growth, gymnasts, radius

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(06)00294-0

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2006.10.003

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 65-75, January 2007