Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 4 , Pages 425-430, October 2006

Assessment of Femoral Neck Strength by 3-Dimensional X-ray Absorptiometry

  • Anthony Le Bras

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Biomécanique, ENSAM-CNRS Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Anthony Le Bras, Biospace Instruments, 10 rue Mercoeur, Paris, 75011 France.
  • ,
  • Sami Kolta

      Affiliations

    • Centre d'Evaluation des Maladies Osseuses, Service de Rhumatologie Hôpital Cochin AP-HP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Philippe Soubrane

      Affiliations

    • Service d'orthopédie de l'Hôpital St Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Wafa Skalli

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Biomécanique, ENSAM-CNRS Paris, France
  • ,
  • Christian Roux

      Affiliations

    • Centre d'Evaluation des Maladies Osseuses, Service de Rhumatologie Hôpital Cochin AP-HP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
  • ,
  • David Mitton

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Biomécanique, ENSAM-CNRS Paris, France

Received 24 February 2006; received in revised form 7 August 2006; accepted 18 August 2006. published online 29 September 2006.

Abstract 

Hip fractures due to osteoporosis are accompanied with increased mortality and morbidity. Bone mineral density (BMD [g/cm2]) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most important risk factor. However, an overlap exists between results of fractured and nonfractured populations. Macro-architectural parameters of the femur are independent risk factors of fracture. They have been evaluated in two dimensions using X-ray films or DXA scans; therefore, they are highly dependent on patient positioning and interindividual anatomical variations. To overcome this problem, we have previously shown the possibility to reconstruct human femurs using two perpendicular DXA scans and to calculate 3-dimensional (3D) geometric parameters from these reconstructions by a method called 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA). The aim of this article is to assess whether the combination of areal BMD and 3D geometric parameters calculated from 3D-XA improves failure load prediction of human proximal femurs in stance phase configuration. Twelve femurs (11 women, 1 man; aged 88±9 yr; range: 72–103 yr) were included in this study. The BMD was measured using a Hologic Delphi-W device (Hologic, Waltham, MA) and 3D reconstruction of the femurs was done using two perpendicular DXA scans as previously published. The calculated 3D geometric parameters included femoral neck axis length (FNAL), mid-femoral neck cross-sectional area (mid-FN CSA), neck shaft angle (NSA), and femoral head diameter (FHD). Mechanical testing was performed using stance phase configuration, which resulted in subcapital fractures. The FHD was correlated to mid-FN CSA and FNAL (r=0.68 and 0.76, respectively; p<0.001). Failure load was correlated to age, FHD, NSA, and BMD measurements. Multiple regression analysis showed that femoral neck BMD, FHD, and mid-FN CSA gave the best statistical model for failure load prediction (r2=0.84; p<0.002). This is the first study suggesting that combining areal BMD to 3D geometric parameters obtained by 3D-XA improve failure load prediction in human femurs.

Key Words: 3D-XA, bone densitometry, DXA, failure strength, geometry

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(06)00256-3

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2006.08.007

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 4 , Pages 425-430, October 2006