Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 4 , Pages 388-392, October 2006

DXA Quality Matters

  • E. Michael Lewiecki

      Affiliations

    • New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: E. Michael Lewiecki, MD, FACP, New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, 300 Oak St. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106.
  • ,
  • Neil Binkley

      Affiliations

    • University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
  • ,
  • Steven M. Petak

      Affiliations

    • Texas Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX

Received 31 May 2006; accepted 10 July 2006.

Abstract 

The proliferation of devices to measure bone mineral density (BMD), with large numbers of technologists operating these instruments and numerous physicians interpreting/reporting the results, raises concern regarding the quality of the studies. High quality BMD measurement and reporting is essential, since referring healthcare providers rely on these reports to make patient care decisions that include additional medical evaluation (laboratory or imaging tests), drug therapy (starting, stopping, or changing), and possibly referral to an osteoporosis specialist. Incorrect BMD acquisition or reporting may generate unnecessary medical expenses and result in therapeutic decisions that could be harmful to patients. Contrary to the common misperception that BMD measurement and interpretation is a simple procedure requiring no special expertise, densitometer maintenance/operation, data acquisition, and interpretation/reporting of the results are skills that must be acquired and maintained. We recommend that technologists and clinicians involved with performing or interpreting BMD tests be educated and trained in bone densitometry and that they update their skills regularly. We also suggest that they provide demonstration of proficiency in bone densitometry in order to assure patients, referring healthcare providers, and payers of medical services that these skills have been acquired and maintained.

Key Words: Osteoporosis, DXA, quality, pitfalls, standards

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(06)00223-X

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2006.07.002

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 4 , Pages 388-392, October 2006