Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 3 , Pages 323-328, July 2006

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Assessment of Central Skeletal Sites From Peripheral BMD and Ultrasonographic Measurements: An Improved Solution Employing Age and Weight in Type 3 Regression

  • Edward B. Silberstein

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Edward B. Silberstein, MD, 234 Goodman Street, University Hospital, G026 Mont Reid Pavilion, Cincinnati, OH 45219.
  • ,
  • Linda L. Levin

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biostatistics, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
  • ,
  • Mariano Fernandez-Ulloa

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
  • ,
  • Margery L. Gass

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
  • ,
  • Judy H. Hughes

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Received 6 December 2005; received in revised form 6 March 2006; accepted 28 March 2006.

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to develop a method whereby bone mineral density measurements of the heel and finger, as well as ultrasonographic measurements of calcaneal sound transmission, could identify individuals with a diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia by the World Health Organization criteria for these diagnoses in the central skeleton (i.e., the lumbar spine (LS) and hip [femoral neck] [FN]). Two hundred and forty-four women in a university hospital laboratory setting had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the calcaneus, finger, hip, and spine, and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus. Regression equations were developed to predict central bone mineral T-scores from T-scores of peripheral measurements, adjusted by age and weight. Equations were validated by predicting the cut point for osteopenia at the lumbar spine and hip (T-score=1.0). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals of the mean predicted LS or FN T-score from each peripheral site included −1.0. We conclude that our derived regression equations (taking into account interaction of peripheral BMD with patient age and weight) are useful for predicting T-scores in the central skeleton. This approach reduces the potential for misdiagnosis, which can result if one uses unadjusted peripheral T-scores, which are only moderately correlated with the central measurements of BMD.

Key Words: Bone mineral density (BMD), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), osteoporosis, osteopenia, quantitative ultrasound (QUS)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(06)00045-X

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2006.03.015

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 3 , Pages 323-328, July 2006