Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 198-201, April 2006

Comparisons of the Bone Mineral Density in Dominant and Nondominant Forearm Following Clean-Cut Tendon Injuries, Repair, and Passive Mobilization

  • Ersoy Kekilli

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Inonu University, Medical Faculty, Malatya, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Ersoy Kekilli, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inonu University, Medical Faculty, 44280 Malatya, Turkey.
  • ,
  • Kadir Ertem

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Inonu University, Medical Faculty, Malatya, Turkey
  • ,
  • Saim Yologlu

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Biostatistics, Inonu University, Medical Faculty, Malatya, Turkey
  • ,
  • Fethi Ceylan

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Inonu University, Medical Faculty, Malatya, Turkey

Received 5 December 2005; received in revised form 27 January 2006; accepted 28 January 2006.

Abstract 

Tendon lacerations at the distal forearm are a common clinical problem. The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is any significant bone loss of the dominant and nondominant forearm due to early passive mobilization in surgically treated patients for acute tendon-artery-nerve clean-cut injuries at the wrist level. Fifty-eight dominant right-handed patients who underwent such an operation were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Patients in group 1 (n=26) were operated on for dominant forearm clean-cut injuries; patients in group 2 (n=29) were operated on for nondominant forearm clean-cut injuries. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of ulna and radius were obtained at weeks 1 and 6, and at months 3 and 12 after the operation. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the radius and ulna did not change significantly with time in group 1 (p>0.05). In group 2, BMD measurements were reduced significantly more with time in the mid-diaphysis and distal regions of the ulna and in the ultra-distal region of the radius. Most BMD decreases were observed at month 3 of the study. Eventually, these bone losses were found to be recovered at month 12.

Key Words: Bone mineral density, dominant hand, immobilization, tendon injury

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(06)00025-4

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2006.01.004

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 198-201, April 2006