Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 150-153, April 2006

The Impact of Bone Area on Short-Term Bone Density Precision

  • William D. Leslie

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to William D. Leslie, MD, Department of Medicine (C5121), 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R2H 2A6, Canada.
  • ,
  • for the Manitoba Bone Density Program

Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

Received 13 November 2005; received in revised form 5 December 2005; accepted 5 December 2005.

Abstract 

It has been proposed that bone area on two scans should be very close (within 2%) in order to ensure a valid comparison, but this recommendation has not been critically evaluated. We assessed the importance of bone area in test precision within a regional testing program that maintains a large quality assurance database (208 analyzable scan-pairs). Differences in bone area exceeding the “2% rule” were common (22–46% depending upon site). Scan-pairs that exceeded the 2% rule were associated with significantly greater bone density measurement error for the lumbar spine (p<0.005) and femoral neck (p=0.001), but not the total hip. A simpler “1-cm2 rule” for the lumbar spine also predicted significantly worse spine precision (p<0.005). In conclusion, differences in bone area are sources of short-term bone density measurement error.

Key Words: Bone densitometry, precision, quality assurance, osteoporosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(06)00012-6

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2005.12.001

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 150-153, April 2006