Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 133-143, April 2006

Cost-Effectiveness of Vertebral Fracture Assessment to Detect Prevalent Vertebral Deformity and Select Postmenopausal Women With a Femoral Neck T-Score>−2.5 for Alendronate Therapy: A Modeling Study

  • John T. Schousboe

      Affiliations

    • Park Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, MN
    • Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: John T. Schousboe, MD, MS, Park Nicollet Clinic, 3800 Park Nicollet Boulevard, Minneapolis, MN 55416.
  • ,
  • Kristine E. Ensrud

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
    • Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
  • ,
  • John A. Nyman

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
  • ,
  • Robert L. Kane

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
    • Clinical Outcomes Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
  • ,
  • L. Joseph Melton III

      Affiliations

    • Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Received 4 September 2005; received in revised form 7 October 2005; accepted 1 November 2005.

Abstract 

Most fractures occur in postmenopausal women who do not have osteoporosis by bone density criteria (T-score>−2.5). Prevalent vertebral deformity is a strong risk factor for incident fractures independent of bone mineral density, yet the majority of these deformities are clinically unapparent. Spine imaging on a dual-energy densitometer, called vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), can accurately detect these deformities. The purpose of this modeling study was to estimate the lifetime societal costs and health benefits of VFA and confirmatory follow-up radiography to detect prevalent vertebral deformity in osteopenic (T-score −1.5, −2.0, or −2.4) postmenopausal women, followed by anti-resorptive drug therapy for those with one or more deformities. We compared three strategies; no initial drug therapy, 5 yr of initial alendronate therapy, or VFA followed by 5 yr of alendronate therapy in those with one or more vertebral deformities confirmed on radiography (VFA strategy). Results for the base-case analyses showed that the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained for the VFA strategy relative to no initial drug therapy ranged from $18,000 (for a 60-yr-old with a femoral neck T-score of −2.4) to $77,000 (for an 80-yr-old with a T-score of −1.5). VFA with selective confirmatory radiography is cost-effective, assuming a societal willingness to pay per QALY gained of $50,000, for postmenopausal women aged 60 to 80 yr with femoral neck T-scores between −2.0 and −2.4, and for women age 60 or 70 yr with a T-score of −1.5. Assuming a societal willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY gained, VFA is also cost-effective for women age 80 yr with a T-score of −1.5. These conclusions are robust to reasonable changes in fracture rates, assumed fracture disutility, discount rates, relative risk of fracture attributable to vertebral deformity, alendronate cost, and drug adherence.

Key Words: Cost-effectiveness, vertebral fracture assessment, alendronate

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1094-6950(06)00011-4

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2005.11.004

Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 133-143, April 2006